School Camp at Helleviga

Luxury Gapahuks

The week in Helleviga was interesting in different aspects. For the first time during this semester we planed activities, which were for students outside our group. Moreover we were in charge of the program so that we had to organize ourselves and look out that everything went well. Another aspect was about our group development because it was the first time after the Snow hole trip that we went on a trip as a whole group.

I was never interested in teaching children or adolescents. My plan was to do recreational work with adults and elderly people. During this week I started to like working with young people. In comparison to the work with adults it is more spontaneous and people are more exploring their possibilities.

A Shelter?

THE Shelter

Additionally I had some new views on leadership and leadership behaviour during these days. The first session I was responsible for shelter building. As the majority had never built a shelter, our influence on them was rather high. The smallest comment or gesture had a huge impact on the shelter that was to be built. When we wanted the next group to do something new, we just supposed another spot or gave them another idea or tip and the shelter turned out to be, as we wanted it. Furthermore the less information you gave the students the more they got into talking and thinking. Especially one group impressed us by building an igloo like shelter within 10 minutes.

The other days were not as interesting because our responsibility changed. We played some group dynamic games, which were funny however the learning outcome was rather low.

Birdwatching

We split up into two groups to watch the birds. I was in the first group which had to build the bird watch shelter. We left from UiA at 1600 to drive about 30 minutes, left our cars there and walked about 1km uphill. On the way the instructor Svein told us different things about the flora and fauna e.g. the bud of the rowan (tree) taste like marzipan. Moreover it is possible to eat ants or their pee. Finally then he showed us the cane which was used as a candlewick in the old days.

The shelter

The shelter

When we reached the place to stay we started to build a shelter out of logs, ropes and tarpaulins. It became the biggest shelter ever build for a bird watch of UiA student as Svein told us. During this work it was easy to see different phenomenons of group dynamics. On the one hand there were people starting to build while others talked about how to set the shelter up best. On the other hand some social loathing occurred and increased with the time. I really enjoyed this building process and learned useful knots and different way of building shelters. This was kind of new to me.

Under Construction

Under Construction

Finally we finished the shelter and one after another put their things inside. Then were eating our dinner and setting up a hunting bird in a tree to scare away the capercaillies on the next morning. To not scare them from the beginning, we put a plastic bag over the bird and made a construction with ropes which enabled us to pull a rope from the shelter and lift the bag from the hunting bird. Afterwards we went for a small walk with Svein to learn a bit more about the nature. Birds like to sit on dead trees which oftentimes are affected by the birch polypore. About peat moss Svein told us a spine-chiller: while construction work in Denmark a dead body was found. The police was called and they detected that the man was executed 2400 years ago. The “Tollund Man” was preserved by theses peat moss. Furthermore we learned different songs of different birds and animals.

When it got darker we even heard the capercaillies close by which was why we went into the shelter and kept whispering. Much fun was to play asshole in the shelter with head torches. I won all the time which was I guess a bit annoying for my mates. Anyway we went to sleep after some time.

The next morning Katja woke me up pinching my nose. I guess I snored a bit maybe. It was 6:00h and everyone was asleep till Katja told me that she saw a capercaillie. Svein got up too and handed over his binocular. When I spotted the bird and heard Katja whispering into my ear “all in all it looks like a black chicken on a tree” I couldn’t hold it and started laughing. She was so right. After watching THE bird a few minutes we got bored and went to sleep. At 9:00h we got up and walked back to our cars. As the one and only bird already left we didn’t even have to use our construction to let the hunting bird appear.

Conclusion

Cosy and Comfy

All in all it was a great trip for group bonding. The tasks were interesting and not difficult. We had time to play and talk and joke around. Everyone had to be in the same shelter which gave us time as a whole group. The facts Svein told us were exciting and the one capercaillie made the trip successful.

 

Group A: Self Organized Day Trip With The Norwegians

Wednesday International Day Jegersberg (18.02.2015)

Group A: Will, Sharon, Katja, Flurin, Ste, Roman, Daniel, Miriam, Jochen, Osvaldas, Adele

  1. Meeting: spicheren 9:15h
  2. Adele will teach a name game on the way to Jegersberg
  3. Students will be split into two groups and learn eachothers names to start the day and get to know the other Norwegians names on their team.
  4. Name Games: ball name gave with Set, stick game with Sharon
  5. Rules will be given by Sharon/ Katja, and the teams will have 5min to hide their flag.
  6.  Boundaries for capture the flag will be marked on the Jegersberg map that all students have been given. Will / Daniel/ Roman
  7.  Flurin/Miriam in charge of fire for lunch- smores
  8.  Reflection: look at the shelters and analyze why people built them the way that they did and the location.

Ref: Ste, Sharon, Roman, Adele
Jail break: Build a shelter that will be judged at the end of the day
Learning outcomes for the day:  getting to know eachother better, introducing competeiveness to Norwegian students, learning a new game, trying a different cultures food.

Evaluation:

Planning the trip:

We had little time to plan the trip after we heard about it on Friday. It wasn’t clear that our group had to organize this trip. However we managed to meet on Monday evening. After a short brainstorming we decided to focus on bringing the Norwegians and Internationals closer. As we didn’t know any of the other group’s names, we decided to start with name learning games. The theme of our trip was to show some of our international outdoor traditions. Hence we decided to play “capture the flag” which is a competitive game between two groups and popular to be played in different countries. To keep the prisoners from being bored we added the new rule of building your own prison like a shelter.

In the end of the day we included a US-campfire-tradition which is a snack called “s’more”. It’s made out of grilled marshmallows, chocolate and crackers.

Realization of the plan:

The name games helped each other to get in contact. In the end most of the people knew all of the names. If we would repeat learning the names at the beginning of each following trip we should manage to know everyone. Knowing one’s names is important for a good communication in the group.

Splitting the people up into two groups took some time because it wasn’t clear how many referees were needed. Next time we should decide on how man we need before or we could stop having referees if the rules are clear. Additionally a lot of people became confused by the rules because we didn’t agree on them in the first hand. Defining the exact rules during the planning meeting can improve this.

However after a short first round everyone got the rules. Hence we played a really funny second round for about 90 minutes.

Katja and her s'more

We adapted our plan to the circumstances thus we skipped the part with building shelters. None of the prisoners was captured for a long time so nobody got bored.

Finally making the s’more around the campfire was a great activity to get everyone involved and closer. Norwegians and Internationals enjoyed the lunchtime together.

All in all the aim of our trip to mix up the group and teach some International traditions was successful.

3rd Day Trip With The Norwegians

Theme:

Strength test. Physically arduous trip in the backcountry, with emphasis on map and compass work. On skis if conditions permit.

Preparation Post:

“International friends! Meet outside of Spicheren at 0915 tomorrow.

Checklist:

  • Food + something hot to drink
  • Some rope
  • Proper boots to keep your feet warm and dry
  • 
Something to sit on
  • 
An extra pair of dry socks
  • 
Pencil and paper
  • 
Map of Jegersberg (if you have it)
  • Compass
  • 
Something to keep your maps and paper dry

We’ll be on foot all day, so don’t put on too many layers, and bring something to keep you hydrated and your energy up.

The weather forecast says it’s going to be raining all day so your outfit should at least be water resistant/proof.!

Activities:

Ref: Krs O-KlubbWe walked to the „Øvre Jegersbergvann“ close to a dam and were divided into 4 groups. The groups were competing against each other in an orienteering race. The plan was for each group to reach four places in the area around Jegersberg (map: 4,6,11,14). Every station contained a task, which had to be done. Afterwards the group had walk back to the main meeting point. There they were told were to go next. Every group had to pass the stations in a different order. The winner got chocolates and we went straight home without a lunch break because most people were freezing.

Learning Outcome:

  • Map and compass work (not necessarily)
  • Carry an injured person downhill (risky)
  • Norway’s highest mountain: Galdhøpiggen (2469 m)
  • Different ways to build a fire: star, pyramid, parallel, tepee
  • Name nocturnal animals: rabbit, deer, fox and hamster
  • Endurance in rainy and cold weather

Evaluation:

The idea was quite good. Everyone was physical active and group members had to work together to finish the tasks. Because of the hard weather conditions, slippery ground, rain and cold temperature it was hard to walk fast thus the whole competition was much longer. One of the groups went home because the members were discouraged by the conditions. It would have been easier to stay motivated if there had been time for a small break. Furthermore the task of station 4 was too risky. We had to jump downhill on one leg. One can easily twist the ankles doing this a steep path down plus the slippery ice on the ground made it even harder. The leaders should have adapted their plan to the situational circumstances.

Additionally the theme of the trip could have been used to practice map reading and compass skills. However there was no time to practice because people already knowing it took over so that the group would be fastest. In my opinion for a higher learning outcome it is sometimes better to not make a competition about it.

Skiing In Jegersberg

On our first skiing trip we went to Jegersberg, which is a local area close to the university. We started our trip on a prepared road that went slightly uphill. This starting point allowed us to check if the wax on our skies was working and to warm up a bit. Especially for the beginners it was a nice way to try out the skis and techniques. Up the hill the path crossed a lake and led through the wood into an open area. Some of the hills on the way were a bit to steep for however it was possible to walk without skis because of the snow condition.

The open area offered a variety of qualities, which were suitable for a heterogenic group. One could choose between flat ground, small hills with powder or prepared steeper hills with cross-country ski runs. Hence everyone was able to find a ground to improve their technique additionally the powder allowed to practice unknown tasks without the fear of getting injured.

Most of the time we used a small hill were everyone did the same tasks. There was enough space to stop in the end of the hill furthermore it was possible to watch the others exercising which helped to learn from one another.

 

The role of the (vei)leader:

Veileder is the Norwegian word for guide. If you translate it directly it means way leader. In the forming phase of a group leaders can be naturally developed depending on the characteristics of the group members and their goal. Oftentimes, like in our study program, the leader is set by the structure of an institution.

Cheladurai states three states of leader behavior that depend on situational factors as well as on the groups and leaders characteristics. Hence it is required that the leader has a basic amount of knowledge, which enables him to guide a group to a certain goal in a certain situation. A preferred state of leadership is the ability to fulfill the groups expectations. Finally the actual state is what actually happens in the certain situation with the special characteristics of the group. On the ski trip we went through a wood where the path went up and down. Len was guiding us the way and as it was difficult to climb up the steeper hills on ski Len adapted his plan to the situation and as a transformational leader told us that we could take of our skis. In this situation the aim of this trip “improve the skiing ability” was changed to “reach the open area”.

Based on the state of leadership there are different ways of leading a group. These methods vary from being autocratical to delegating the decisions to a group and let them develop themselves e.g. In a case of emergency a leader should act autocratically in contrast if there are different possibilities to get to the goal, the leader can let the group develop a plan.

To learn an exact technique very quickly a teacher would give instructions about how to move the body and how the technique works. An instruction like “if you go uphill, you have to look forward. Don’t look down on your ski”. By following the instruction the students develop a functional technique to ski uphill. Another teaching method would be to let the students develop their techniques themselves. Referring to the before mentioned task he would say “ski uphill”. The students would try and maybe slip down backwards. After a while they would realize that they only slip if they look down on their ski. The first method saves time however the second method gives the student a deeper understanding for the movement of his body and is therefore sustainable.

As mentioned before the leader has to react to the given situation and group characteristics. He has to choose an area that is suitable for the certain size of group. If the group is too big for one person to handle the teacher has to organize another guide. Furthermore he has to calculate how far the weakest member can go and how long it will take. Every student should be able to join hence the trip should be to a local area. For a bigger outcome it would be wise to include the group in some decisions during the organization of the tour. This would increase the students’ internal motivation.

Observation can be done in different ways. It should help the students to improve their techniques and motivate them to keep on practicing additionally it should prevent cases of emergency. When the group is moving the teacher observes the students by walking from one to the other. If he would stay on the same position like in front guiding the way, he couldn’t actually see what is going on. This way of jumping from one to the other allows the teacher to be in direct and personal contact with one student at a time. If the group stays at one place it allows the teacher to observe specific details of each student. There he can give direct advices to one student while watching the whole group.

On a daytrip the general equipment needed is related to emergency. A first-aid kit, a rope, something to light fire, an emergency shelter like a bivouac bag or a first aid mat and always a bit of food in case someone is out of energy. For the activities you can easily use branches or other thing s you can find in nature because on a Friluftsliv trip one should be as close to nature as possible. Still if nature is not enough one can improvise like we did using our skiing poles to play with.

The role of the students:

Motivation is what keeps the student going therefore it is the fundamental requirement for each task. It can be divided into external and internal motivation. External motivation is subdivided into three states. The lowest state is called introjected motivation when people do something for an external reason like money or good grates. After this the motives become more personal e.g. if students are allowed to take part in organizing a skiing trip. The partaking makes them identify with the trip even if they don’t like skiing therefore this state of motivation is called identified regulation. The state of external motivation, which is closest to internal motivation, is called integrated regulation. For example if a student takes part in the outdoor education program because he wants to become a veileder. Finally the internal motivation is defined as the state of motivation when one does something because he likes to do it. In other words one can say: the way is the goal.

As mentioned before motivation has a big influence on how students act. Planing the activities for a daytrips has to be orientated on the motivation as well as on the goal. The group should be satisfied by the performance. This aim leads to the discussion about free playing versus organized playing. If the students are allowed to play as they like, they are highly motivated and active. The satisfaction increases and the atmosphere is positive. Additionally creativity is needed and stimulated.

On the other hand the free plays stay on one level and students can’t improve their technique. Moreover students who are beginners can rarely take part in the games. This leads to a good mixture of free games were the body can develop new moves and organized games, which concentrate on specific details and allow everyone to learn.

Activities

The activities took place on a small hill as mentioned before. We were able to watch each other and one student did the exercise at the time.

  1. Ski downhill
  2. touch your heels 6 times
  3. small parallel sidesteps
  4. left foot, right foot
  5. through the poles
  6. throw your hat at Len before skiing through the poles

These activities improved the feeling for our skis. Touching the heels provoked bending the knees without leaning forwards. The parallel sidesteps are a useful technique to stay in a curve in higher speed. They as well led to standing on one foot thus trained the balance. Likewise did the exercise number 4. Skiing through the poles was a variation of the heel touching exercise and throwing the hat at Len made it even more difficult to concentrate and react. By these exercises the gross motor skills are being trained. In the beginnings of a learning process it is important to practice the movement in an easier way. During this phase of learning the big muscle groups are used and a lot of energy is put into the movement. The movement is halting and gross sometimes too fast or too slow overall it is inconsistent. The area used has to be adapted to the student’s ability. Through repetition the movement becomes fluent and functional this is because of the afferent synthesis by the neuronal system. As this state of learning is reached the exercises should be repeated on a steeper hill come closer to the fine motor skills.

Conclusion

As I have done cross-country skiing before I don’t need to practice my gross motor skills for skiing. Anyway the exercises were important to get the feeling for my skis again. Moreover the exercises were new to me so I practiced my coordinative skills. I am in the second phase of motor learning after Meinel and Schnabel that is about repeating the technique in variable surroundings and adapting the motor skills to the changing ground. Therefore I went on a short skiing tour with a small group. As I didn’t want to wax my ski again I did the skating technique, which I know better than the classical one. So in the end I didn’t improve my technique but I learned more about how to plan a day trip with a heterogenic group.

Compared to my home university we did the skiing introduction in a totally different way. My first cross-country ski lesson started without skis. It was all about the motor skills, coordination, balance and rhythm. After one hour warming up we put on one of the skis and did some partner work. The day ended with a one-ski-soccer-match. However we were a more homogenous group then so no one was bored and skiing was new to everyone. As we are not on the same level of learning in our recent group, the exercises were suitable for a wider range of students. Considering the time we had and the group’s constitution, it was an informative tour to all of us especially as we were able to choose what we wanted to do in the end.

1st Day Trip With The Norwegians

Theme:

A typical Norwegian family/sunday trip. Focus on campfire, grilling, icebreaker activities. Get to know the international students.

Preparation Post:

“Hi guys!
Mondag 12.01.2015, meet us outside Spicheren 09:15.
Where: Jegersberg, take with the Jegerberg map you got today.
What you got to take with you:

  •  warm clothes
  •  food: hotdogs/sausages, kvikklunsj, orange
  •  drinks
  •  backpack
  •  knife”

Activities:

We met at Spicheren and walked to the green area in Jegersberg. The group explained the tradition of the Sunday trip in Norway. Every Sunday the families go for a hike in the nature. They take lunch or make a campfire with their children. It is common to do this no matter what the weather is like. The group leaders behaved as if they were parents taking us on a Sunday trip. To mix up the international and Norwegian students we played tug of war and of course our group won. The game helped to get in touch with new people.

After this we followed our parent-guides to the mountain “Den Omvendte Båt”. Before we reached the top, we had a “kvikk lunsj” and orange break and of we signed into the summit register. Eating this on a Sunday trip is common too, as we learned. We continued our journey. On the top of the mountain we were told a story about the mountain’s history during WWII.

The plan was to make a campfire on the mountaintop but due to the weather conditions the group changed it. So we went down to the lake and searched for a wind-sheltered area. We lit a fire with the wood we brought with us (each of us carried one piece). We made sausages and stick-bread on the fire which is a Norwegian tradition.

Finally we went back to Spicheren and everybody walked home happy and relaxed.

Learning outcome:

  • Norwegian traditions and culture
  • Get in contact with the Norwegians
  • Historical background of the area

Evaluation:

The daytrip gave me a good insight into the Norwegian Sunday trip tradition. The game at the beginning helped to get in touch with some new people. However only one game was too little hence the internationals and Norwegians didn’t really mix up.

The route of the trip was beautiful and the distances were easy. In my opinion it was a bit too much of following the leaders and too little work for us. This is the reason why there was no learning outcome linked to outdoor skills. This was the same with building/lighting the campfire. The guides found a fireplace and didn’t explain what they did.

In general it was a well-organized trip and the leaders adapted their plan to the situational conditions. Additionally the way of leading reminded of parents guiding their children so it really felt like a Sunday trip.